Archive

The Best of Brit Lit

A look at great reads from the editor of the Times Literary Supplement. This week: Somerset Maugham’s wild sexuality, how snakes help us see, and the importance of literary mags.

articles/2009/10/08/the-best-of-brit-lit-14/brit-lit---somerset-maugham_crxvy9
articles/2009/10/08/the-best-of-brit-lit-14/brit-lit---somerset-maugham_wd8fpr

Somerset Maugham’s Bondage

Somerset Maugham is one of those authors now more read about than read. In 1907, he had four plays running simultaneously in London and in 1940 George Orwell listed him with Lawrence and Joyce among the lasting authors of his time. Selina Hastings' new biography focuses instead on what is now the much more studied aspect of his life, what Jeremy Treglown in the TLS this week describes as a "thrilling but increasingly wretched sexuality." Treglown hopes that readers of the life will be drawn back to his iconic works—to Of Human Bondage as well as to the heated bedroom behavior of Cap Ferrat's Villa Mauresque. But Hastings' biographical approach remains wholly justified, he believes, for the career of "an extraordinary, extravagant, generous, and bitter artist."

articles/2009/10/08/the-best-of-brit-lit-14/brit-lit---the-fruit-the-tree-and-the-serpent_vyfjih

Snakes on the Brain

After reading about Maugham's adventurous sexuality (and that of Hugh Hefner and Theodore Dreiser, too, this week), TLS readers might be left seeking some deeper scientific explanation of the serpent in Adam and Eve’s garden. Barbara J. King provides one through the thesis of Lynne A. Isbell that species can be divided between those that have evolved closely alongside snakes and those that have not. Isbell's book is titled The Fruit, the Tree and the Serpent: Why We See So Well. Primates, it seems, are evolutionarily prepared to fear, detect, and respond to snakes. Their eyes improve accordingly. The species that have seen the most serpents see everything else better, too.

articles/2009/10/08/the-best-of-brit-lit-14/brit-lit---the-oxford-critical_pejmje

Modernism’s Little Magazines

When T.S. Eliot was asked what literary magazines were for, he gave two very different answers at different times in his life. One: 'To introduce the work of new or little-known writers of talent.” Two: “The maintenance of critical standards and the concentration of intelligent critical opinion.” The Cambridge professor, Stefan Collini, uses the publication of The Oxford Critical and Cultural History of Modernist Magazines to reflect on the continuing tension between these two aims. Short-lived magazines such as Acorn (1905-6) and New Numbers (1914) are evaluated alongside Eliot's own Criterion (1922-39).

Plus: Check out Book Beast for more news on hot titles and authors and excerpts from the latest books.

Peter Stothard is editor of the Times Literary Supplement. He was editor of The Times of London from 1992-2002. He writes about ancient and modern literature and is the author of Thirty Days, a Downing Street diary of his time with British Prime Minister Tony Blair during the Iraq war.

Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.