Archive

8 Revelations From Walmart’s Mexican Bribery Scandal

Cheat Sheet

A massive New York Times investigation exposes how Walmart allegedly ignored evidence of bribery south of the border. Read 8 revelations from the report.

articles/2012/04/22/8-revelations-from-walmart-s-mexican-bribery-scandal/walmart-mexico-things-to-know-tease_s2xcim
David Rochkind / Bloomberg via Getty Images

1. A Former Walmart Exec Blows the Whistle via Email

According to The New York Times, in 2005, a former exec at Walmart de Mexico named Sergio Cicero Zapata alleged in an email to a senior Walmart lawyer that the retail giant’s Mexican arm routinely greased the skids, dishing out generous payouts to aid its mammoth growth. (Currently, one in five Walmart stores is located in Mexico.) An investigator’s dream, Cicero named names, as well as provided details on when the bribes were given and how much they totaled. Cicero had resigned from the company in 2004 because, he told the Times, he felt underappreciated after participating in years of corruption.

2. Walmart Launches an Investigation

With Cicero’s email in hand, Walmart sprang into action—for a time. A set of company sleuths were sent south, traveling to Mexico City to see if there was truth to the bombshell revelations. According to the Times: there was. After unearthing evidence of bribes in excess of $24 million, the chief investigator, a former FBI special agent, sent an email to company headquarters saying, “There is reasonable suspicion to believe that Mexican and USA laws have been violated.”

3. Walmart Shuts Down Investigation

After top Walmart execs were presented with evidence of misconduct, top management struggled for a while with how to respond, reports the Times. At stake was the company’s much-touted support for high ethical standards, which in this case was at odds with its allegedly shady formula for market dominance. Facing a potential PR nightmare, execs appear to have been more concerned with spin than solutions. They never contacted legal authorities about the findings, and ultimately appointed the general counsel of Walmart de Mexico—who himself faced allegations of bribery—to handle the case. He exonerated his colleagues and shut down the investigation, according to the Times.

4. Bribes Led to Building Permits

In their investigation, reporters from the Times, who scoured thousands of government documents relating to building permit requests in Mexico, found that the alleged bribes were incredibly effective, making permit obstacles vanish in days or weeks. All layers of bureaucratic and political life were allegedly receptive to this liberal outlay of cash, as zoning concerns and environmental fines disappeared and Walmart expanded across the country.

articles/2012/04/22/8-revelations-from-walmart-s-mexican-bribery-scandal/walmart-mexico-things-to-know-tease_qoxdny

5. Eduardo Castro-Wright’s Dubious Rise

Eduardo Castro-Wright was chief operating officer of Walmart de Mexico until 2005, and was promoted to Walmart’s vice chairman in 2008. Although the Times reports that there had been a few bribes before Castro-Wright’s arrival in 2002, the frequency of bribes increased dramatically while he was in charge, and Cicero identified him as the force behind much of the corruption. His goal was to rapidly obtain building permits, so Walmart could build stores faster and remain ahead of the competition. When he was promoted to his post in the U.S. (three years after the bribery investigation began), the company cited his “outstanding results” in Mexico. He is scheduled to retire in July.

6. How the Alleged Bribes Were Delivered

The alleged bribes were paid through “gestores,” professional fixers that many companies (and individuals) in Mexico hire to ensure that things get done quickly and effortlessly—sometimes legally, sometimes not. They are often involved in Mexico’s corruption scandals. The gestores, who charge a fee of 6 percent of the bribe, worked closely with company officials to determine whom to pay off, the Times reports. They provided the company with coded invoices that described the “irregular act” they had carried out. In accounting records, the bribes were allegedly disguised as legal fees.

7. Former FBI Special Agent Led Internal Investigation

Ronald Halter, who spent more than two decades with FBI, was one of Walmart’s special investigators who led the preliminary probe into the bribery allegations in 2005. The investigation confirmed many of Cicero’s allegations, according to the Times; in one day, Halter’s team had uncovered more than 441 instances of potentially illegal payments to gestores. They also discovered that two gestores alone had received $8.5 million in payments. Perhaps most significantly, he found that massive payments ceased in 2005, the same year that Castro-Wright moved to the U.S. Although Walmart had initially planned to launch a full investigation if the probe found any evidence supporting Cicero’s allegations, Halter’s report and the rest of the case was turned over to Walmart de Mexico’s general counsel, who closed the investigation.

8. Walmart Admits to Bribery Probe

Shortly after the Times published its investigation on April 21, 2012, Walmart confirmed that it had launched an investigation into the allegations of bribery at Walmart de Mexico. A spokesman for the company said, “This work is ongoing and continues today,” adding that the company does not “have a full explanation of what happened.”

Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.