A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood isnât a movie about Mr. Rogers. Itâs a movie about us.
Technically, itâs about Tom Junod, a journalist who profiled Fred Rogers for Esquire in 1998. The resulting article, âCan You Say...Hero?â chronicles the litany of good deeds Junod witnesses Rogers perform throughout the day, often simple acts with seismic effects on the people he encounters. It ends with Rogers asking Junod to pray with him, a moment that changed his life completely: who he was as a journalist, as a father, and as a man.
Matthew Rhys plays Lloyd Vogel, the fictional stand-in for Junod, a writer already fragile from his own cynicism who is nearly broken by his deadbeat fatherâs attempts to reconnect with him shortly after the birth of his son. Tom Hanks plays Fred Rogers, the minister who became a childrenâs TV host then beacon of hope for a struggling society, and also the person who saves Lloyd.
Itâs a movie about how much Lloyd (and Junod) needed Mr. Rogers at that time in his life. Itâs about how much we need Mr. Rogers right now. Itâs about how much we need Tom Hanks right now. Itâs about how much we need a movie in which Tom Hanks plays Mr. Rogers right now.
Directed by Marielle Heller (Can You Ever Forgive Me?) and out Friday, itâs a sensitive portrait of an unlikely friendship. Lloyd doesnât get the whole Mr. Rogers schtick. But spending time with him, being a direct, in-person benefactor of the iconâs surprisingly workmanlike investment in other peopleâs well-being, heâs convinced. They forge a bond that is nothing short of profound.
Along the way the film illuminates some truths that are just generally good life advice. Being unhappy doesnât make you more interesting. Being unforgiving doesnât mean youâre strong. It may be easier to motivate people by appealing to their fears rather than their love, but it isnât as productive. Feelings are manageable.
By virtue of the filmâs existence in this formâabout Fred Rogers, at least in part, and starring Tom Hanksâit is inherently, too, a film about niceness and what that means to us today, if it means anything at all.
Of course, Tom Hanks isnât only nice. Heâs a human, and humans arenât just one thing, especially if the one thing is nice. But itâs nice to think of him that way, even if we know weâre being silly. Mr. Rogers wasnât only nice. But it was nice to think of him that way, too. Itâs still nice to think of him that way. Itâs not silly. Itâs necessary. What would we do if we found out that Mr. Rogers wasnât nice? Or, maybe worse, Tom Hanks?
Part of the brilliance of Junodâs Esquire article is how it made the point that yes, Mr. Rogers is a hero, but a hero is also just a man. In the film, when Lloydâs wife learns of his assignment, knowing his penchant for taking the piss out of the people he profiles, she pleads, âOh lord, Lloyd. Please donât ruin my childhood.â
Rogers was so sincere, without a shred of irony, that people would wonder whether a person that sincere could possibly exist today. But Hanks, to most, is actually that person, which is what makes this such great casting. A certain skepticism, the fear that Lloydâs wife voices, accompanies that. Journalists have spent Hanksâ entire career spelunking for juicy gossip, desperate for a âgotchaâ that would expose some grave evil or scandalous vice thatâs been lurking beneath Hollywoodâs Nicest Guy all along, as if it would somehow be more comforting to know he was a misogynist or a lousy drunk or something.
Theyâve all come up short, as Taffy Brodesser-Akner discovers in her recent New York Times magazine profile of Hanks, which cannily checks the same boxes Junodâs profile of Rogers did. He really is that friendly, civil, generous, and kind. In fact, a publicist at one point even relays concern that yet another story about how nice Tom Hanks is could be bad press, that something so boring and expected would hurt the film, or diminish the accomplishment of the excellent acting and transformation he pulls off.
But the profile has the same effect of âCan You Say...Hero?â Even in confirming that Hanks could very well be a living saint, it makes the best-yet case that he is tangibly, relatably real. Itâs we who are so unfamiliar with basic decency today that we refuse to believe that a person like Hanks who casually exhibits it could possibly be a normal human being.
Junod, or Lloyd in the film, is disoriented to the point of suspicion when he encounters Fred Rogers. The world with Mr. Rogers seems off its axis. In Lloydâs world, there is chaos and pain and cynicism and anger and hate. Worse, there are no tools to process those things. This world where Mr. Rogers is as good as heâs supposed to be? Where he has the tools to dig through the badness and come out on the other side? More, heâs willing to share them with youâinsists on it, even? That shouldnât exist.
But Mr. Rogers exists in our world, and in Lloydâs world, too, which is its own disorienting fact. Itâs why, when he was alive, as Junod recounts in his article, people would combust with astonishment. âHoly shit! Itâs Mister Fucking Rogers!â
In A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, Fred and Lloyd ride the subway. After staring and smiling at him, the straphangers on the train start singing the Mister Rogersâ Neighborhood theme song. Itâs a moment so pure and so genuine that it should be terrible, an unbelievable dramatization meant to emotionally manipulate and oversimplify our relationship to this hero. But itâs not that. Itâs perfect, one of the best movie scenes of the year. (It also actually happened.)
Even if briefly, we recognize that world. A world where strangers sing his showâs theme song to Mr. Rogers on the subway is not the world we think we live in now, where everything is so awful and so scary and nearly everyone seems so horrible. But it is our world, in spite of that. The world we live in now still does have niceness in it.
But thatâs the Mr. Rogers ethos. He never pretended that the bad things in the world didnât exist. His neighborhood wasnât one of fantasy. The good and the bad exist together. What matters is how we deal with it. âThereâs always something you can do with the mad that you feel,â he says. It takes Lloyd the entirety of the movie to realize that and figure out what to do with his own âmad.â As we look around at the encroaching nightmare that surrounds us, we wonder how long it will take us to figure it out now, too.
Weâre so starved for niceness today that weâve turned fleeting examples of good things into obsessions. Itâs the year of Lizzo, of the Hot Priest, of Kelly Clarksonâs âkellyoke,â of the âsorry to this manâ meme. We need reasons to be happy and we will milk those sources dry. Even the jaded among us are no longer finding fault in that.
Itâs canny, then, that before A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood screened for critics and reporters in New York earlier this month, it was preceded by a message from Joanne Rogers, Fredâs wife. She talks about how glad she is that the film is coming out now, as she can sense that we are hungry for kindness. She also jokes about how pleased Fred would have been to be played by Tom Hanks. In 2019, itâs a collision of niceness and kindness that would be parody were it not so needed, so exactly right, so true.
Recent yearsâ discussion of how necessary a person like Mr. Rogers isâand whether itâs even possible for there to be another person like him, considering the ways in which society has evolved and digressedâis, in a way, depressing.
Thereâs a dissonance between Rogersâ most famous lineââWonât you be my neighbor?âand the times we live in, of extreme polarization, technology-induced isolation, a bankruptcy of empathy, and literal walls. His maxims like âI like you just the way you areâ are just as radical as ever, when hatred is the societal mantra.
The posthumous resurrection of Mr. Rogers as some sort of savior is a reminder of how timeless hopelessness is. But thereâs also something encouraging about that discussion. Maybe we can be fixed. Itâs happened before.
Until he sings the phrase in A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, Iâd never heard or read Hanks say, âWonât you be my neighbor?â But it seems a version of what heâs done in his career, and by living up to his mythical reputation. His characters invite us to empathize, to discover the strength in humanity and the surprising power of the ordinary, and to see ourselves in the struggles and triumphs of others. His public persona is a reminder that goodness is real.
Tom Hanks as Fred Rogers is in some ways, then, a public service. Itâs not just because itâs refreshing for there to be so much niceness on screen. Itâs a reminder of the ways in which we, whether weâve realized it yet or not, are still capable of being a little like that, too.