Offering a potential roadmap to 2024, a Democratic-aligned group specializing in training staff believes theyâve found a moneyball strategy that worked in 2022 and could change statehouse campaign spending going forward.
In a memo obtained exclusively by The Daily Beast, the theory of the case goes something like this: For just $25,000, you can win a competitive seat. It just depends on when you spend the money, and, whoânot whatâyou spend it on.
As Managing Partner Lauren Baer put it, the pilot program led by Arenaâa nonprofit group backing Democrats and looking to âexpand and diversify who can enter politicsââtargets spending earlier in the cycle and delivering trained staff to campaigns that otherwise couldnât afford them.
They won eight out of the 11 battleground races in Michigan, Arizona, and Pennsylvania where a staffer on a six-month contract earned $25,000, usually as a field organizer or director.
âTypically, you have a campaign manager, and thatâs usually the only person youâll have on a state House campaign,â Trevor Southerland, executive director of the Pennsylvania House Democratic Campaign Committee told The Daily Beast, crediting Arenaâs program for making all the difference in flipping the Pennsylvania House for the first time in 12 years, and winning it by just one seat.
The race was decided by just 63 votes, and the winner, rookie campaigner Melissa Ceratoâwhose resume includes a stint as an Uber driver, house cleaner, and nannyâwas one of the 11 candidates who received Arena-trained staff.
Finding field organizers for state-level campaigns can be a tough task, Southerland explained, with the bulk of talent concentrated in Washington and New York.
âYou tend to be a field organizer right at the beginning of your career, and then you move up to campaign manager or something,â Southerland said. âBut oftentimes finding those youngest people is hard, because thereâs only so many political job boards out there, and if they havenât figured that side out of it yet, theyâre not able to find you.â
So when you get somebody who actually knows what theyâre doing instead of a volunteer who might be prone to flaking?
âWhat it does is cut a few months of on-the-job-training right off,â the Pennsylvania Democrat continued.
Volunteers need to learn the fundamentals: how to drop literature, how to cut up turf, how to make the most of the few seconds you might be able to speak before someone slams the door in your face.
âAnd in this, they have the basics when theyâre hired, so weâre able to jump more straight into getting the work done rather than having to spend extra time training them,â Southerland said.
For Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz, a restaurant owner coming from her first elected position as the Reading City Council president and now the first Latina ever elected to the Pennsylvania State House, the Arena-trained staff helped raise the level of her entire team, including volunteers.
âNow that itâs been proven to workâand oh my gosh, it was a major win this election,â the newly sworn-in state lawmaker told The Daily Beast. âAt the House level, itâs 26 freshmen coming in. Now that theyâve created something that works, keep doing it. In fact, when I think of Arena and what theyâve established, this is a great system.â
Baer said the timing of the spending is key to the âoutsize impactâ Arena sought after.
âIt is categorically true that earlier investments in races can have a greater impact than late cycle investment,â Baer said.
By the time the third and fourth quarter roll around, campaign staff have already been hired and much of the campaign is already set in motion. The easiest place to spend it, by and large, is on ads.
By contrast, Baer said, if candidates get into races earlier and invest in staff, the early money has a âmultiplier effect in terms of voters they can contact, that they can turn out, the capacity that they can build on the ground.â
Arenaâs trainees were on the trail for an average of five months. But they would like to see that number pushed up if they can get donors on board.
âThere is still an overwhelming bias in Democratic politics in late cycle investment, when dollars have the least flexibility in terms of how they can be deployed,â she said. âSo weâve really hit on a low-cost and effective way of deploying resources, but it fundamentally depends on donors being willing to put in money earlier in the cycle.â
Southerland said he could see the same methodology being adopted at the congressional and even presidential level, particularly in suburban areas where the art of efficient door knocking can make all the difference.
âIt can become a model. Itâs certainly scalable to a larger level and reaching more states,â he said.
The Keystone State Democrat cautioned, however, that relying on one organization or set of donors isnât the way to get there.
âWeâre supposed to be the party of the people,â Southerland said. âAnd we have to understand that our people are a big part of why weâre able to do what we do, and that we need to look at really putting investments into our staff for the long term.â