Netflix could be keeping Harry and Meghan sweet for the big divorce interview, journalist speculates
Given the poor reception of everything Harry and Meghan have done since their royal exit, except for their sensational Oprah interview, one wonders why Netflix seems so keen to keep them on the books.
Netflix said that it has already completed filming on a second season of Meghan’s lifestyle show, With Love, Meghan.
Could the reason the streaming giant hasn’t kicked the couple to the curb be another sensational interview?
This is the interesting theory that has been posited by journalist Marina Hyde, who told the podcast “The Rest is Entertainment” that Netflix may make one-off shows with them going forward just to be well positioned in their favor for a big tell-all sit down in case they get divorced.
Hyde said: “The reality is that a lot of people are hanging around in case there’s a divorce. That might be why Netflix, or whoever it might be, who’s got to deal with them, might keep a vague hand in.”
A recent Vanity Fair article claimed Meghan’s team discreetly explored interest in a potential post-divorce book—while insisting she and Harry remain happily married.
Tuesday is the day
For several years now, ayahuasca enthusiast Prince Harry’s immigration status in the United States has been a point of contention.
Now, in a bitter blow for Harry, a Washington, D.C. judge—appointed by President Donald Trump—has ruled that the Department of Justice must release his long-contested immigration records.
The decision, handed down in a reversal of a previous ruling, marks a significant setback for the Duke of Sussex—and could yet have serious consequences for his future in the U.S.
The case was brought by the conservative Heritage Foundation, which has been aggressively pursuing the release of his documents.
The same organization is behind the controversial Project 2025 policy blueprint, which advocates for extreme conservative measures such as banning pornography and reshaping government agencies.
Despite the previous ruling, the Heritage Foundation has now convinced the court that Harry’s records should be made public, with the documents set to be released by Tuesday—unless the government finds a way to delay or block the order, which appears unlikely.
While the documents will be redacted, key questions remain about what will be left visible. The Heritage Foundation’s argument has consistently centered on the claim that Prince Harry should not have received special treatment under U.S. immigration law.
His memoir, Spare, detailed his use of drugs, including cocaine and psychedelic mushrooms—an admission that, under normal circumstances, could complicate a visa application. In one particularly bizarre anecdote, Harry recounted taking magic mushrooms at actress Courteney Cox’s house and hallucinating that a toilet was talking to him.
The Heritage Foundation has asserted that Harry either lied on his application or received an undisclosed waiver from the Biden administration when he moved to the U.S.
If the latter turns out to be true, it could reignite accusations of political favoritism, undermining his carefully crafted image as an independent figure rather than a royal insider unafraid to milk his privilege.
The timing of this legal development could not be worse for Harry and Meghan. The Duchess’s television relaunch has been met with lukewarm reactions, with reports suggesting that what was marketed as a second season of her Netflix show was simply additional footage filmed alongside the first. While the show did reach Netflix’s top ten, it has done little to rehabilitate her public image.
Meanwhile, Harry’s media projects—including his ill-fated Netflix series on polo—has not fared well. Now, the renewed scrutiny over his immigration status threatens to overshadow his efforts to establish himself as a respected public figure in America.
With the release of his immigration documents just days away, Harry faces an uncomfortable reckoning. If the papers reveal any discrepancies or signs of preferential treatment, they could not only jeopardize his legal status in the U.S. but also contradict his broader narrative of stepping away from royal privilege.
For now, all eyes are on Tuesday.
Prince George and Prince Louis love rugby
The Prince and Princess of Wales have shared their children’s growing passion for rugby as they attended the Wales v. England Six Nations match at Cardiff’s Principality Stadium. Prince William revealed that their weekends are now spent shuttling between competitions, while Princess Kate shared that six-year-old Prince Louis has just started touch rugby, and 11-year-old Prince George plays a more competitive game. “They do really enjoy it, actually,” she said.
The match also marked the royal couple’s latest sporting rivalry, with Prince William supporting Wales as patron of the Welsh Rugby Union and Princess Catherine backing England in her role as patron of the Rugby Football Union. The princess, in remission from cancer, continued her gradual return to public engagements, making her first visit to the stadium with Prince William since 2023—when England won, leading the prince to joke about a “tense journey home.”
Prince William, also patron of the Welsh Rugby Charitable Trust, met with injured players and their families, whom the trust supports through annual events and invitations to every Wales home game.
King Charles urged to attend Canada’s state opening of Parliament amid Trump tensions
King Charles is facing calls to attend Canada’s State Opening of Parliament in a show of support for the country amid escalating tensions with U.S. President Donald Trump. As both the U.K. and Canada navigate their relationships with Trump—who is simultaneously being courted with a British state visit while waging an economic and rhetorical battle against Canada—the monarchy finds itself in a delicate diplomatic balancing act.
The king is not only the head of state of the United Kingdom but also of Canada, a constitutional monarchy that has maintained close ties with Britain since its foundation. The late Queen Elizabeth II set a significant precedent by attending the Canadian Parliament’s opening in 1957, reaffirming the deep historical and political links between the two nations. King George VI was the first reigning monarch to visit Canada in 1939, a moment of profound symbolic unity on the eve of World War II.
In recent weeks, Charles has made his support for Canada visibly clear in contrast to Trump’s growing hostility toward the country.
Royal biographer Hugo Vickers told the Daily Mail: “The King or a member of the Royal Family should definitely attend. He is the King of Canada and must do everything possible to make them feel special.”
The monarchy’s role in diplomacy has always been carefully measured, but in this case, Charles is being asked to walk a tightrope between two nations locked in a war of words. His presence in Canada would undoubtedly bolster its national morale and reinforce the idea that, despite Trump’s pressures, Canada remains an independent and sovereign nation under the Crown. At the same time, the royal family’s deepening engagement with Trump underscores the complexity of their position—remaining neutral while navigating relationships that are anything but.
