Just three years ago, the Golden Globes was canceledâboth in the âculture warsâ meaning of that word and quite literally.
Decades of controversy, corruption, and race scandals left the soiree, often billed as Hollywoodâs booziest night, disgraced. The organization and its accompanying telecast have been scraping its way back to legitimacy since and, because you canât keep a town full of sentient egos away from a party thrown in its honor, the industry has returned the Globes back to its status as a major awards stop in kind.
And so, through the power of an organization willing to evolve and a townâs inescapable narcissism, the Golden Globes have pulled it off: Once again, itâs the most fun awards show of the season.
After two years of pointlessness and the embarrassment of last yearâs telecast, miracle of miracles, Sunday nightâs Golden Globes was good.
Letâs face it, 90 percent of America has not seen or maybe even heard of most of the nominees. A significant number of the films arenât even in wide theatrical release yet, while the amount of streaming services youâd have to subscribe to in order to see all the featured TV series would bankrupt an average person. So, awards shows live and die by two things: a host, and winners who understand what it means to give a good speech.
The Globes got that in its ace emcee Nikki Glaser, comedy roaster extraordinaire who approached the gig with just the right mix of affection for the platform and understanding of the lunacy of the bombast she was presiding over. Combating its notoriety for handing out trophies to the most famous stars who were the nicest to themâor who gave them the best bribesâthis year, the organization also rewarded an admirably diverse, deserving group of winners.

The sprawling, ambitious epic ShĆgun, the impeccably written comedy Hacks, and the harrowing, zeitgeist-seizing Netflix hit Baby Reindeer dominated TV categories. The Brutalist and Emilia PĂ©rez were big winners on the film side. A three-and-a-half-hour odyssey and a Spanish-language French musical with a transgender lead are not the stuff that would have been championed in Golden Globe Awards past.
Audiences were likely grateful for the nightâs levity, as that is what the telecast had historically promised, yet lost in the admirable push for all award shows to intangibly âmean somethingâ in recent years.
Glaser kicked things off by welcoming the audience to âOzempicâs biggest night,â wisely steering clear of jokes that would likely trigger groans from a humorless Hollywood crowd while managing to still detonate some provocative punchlines that wouldnât offend too much.
Impossibly, that included edgy one-liners about alleged assassin Luigi Mangione, the never-ending parade of Hollywood predators (even after #MeToo), and, the trickiest, a bit about Diddy and his âfreak-offsâ that somehow managed to land. And even when she did name-check and lightly roast stars, she singled out the likes of TimothĂ©e Chalamet, Nicole Kidman, and Stanley Tucci, the ones who have shown the rare showbiz ability to laugh at themselves.
By the time Glaser broke out into a musical mash-up honoring Wicked and Conclave, only to interrupt herself because of how terrible it was, she had clearly won over the room.
Presenter banter managed to swerve around the landmine for cringe-comedy, thanks to smart pairings like Mindy Kaling and Kate Hudson, Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley, Awkwafina and Melissa McCarthy, and Seth Rogen and Catherine OâHara. Besides their hilarious extended bit about the fake Canadian movies they starred in before becoming famous, the latter two got huge laughs for finally calling out what everyoneâboth at home and in the audienceâhad been thinking: the positioning of the camera with the ballroom behind it and the teleprompter inches from the presentersâ faces was awkward to the point of undignified.
Another new innovation this year: floating pins that showed the locations of nominees in the ballroom as their names were read that, as some pointed out on social media, closely resembled the interface and design of a popular gay sex app. Hey, points for trying something new, Globes.
Much of a successful awards telecast is luck, in that producers have to hope that the chosen winners will deliver great speeches that will captivate everyone at homeâpeople who have no idea what the project they won for is, let alone what the acronym alphabet soup of agencies, production companies, and studios that actors love to thank mean.
Zoe Saldaña got things to an endearingly emotional, if histrionic start for her Best Supporting Actress win for Emilia PĂ©rez. At the very least, it was big energy to start the night with. That was countered beautifully by Kieran Culkinâs inherent, bumbling charm as he accepted Best Supporting Actor for A Real Pain.
Colin Farrell was wonderfully humble and humorous while accepting Best Actor in a TV Limited Series, Anthology, or Movie for The PenguinââYeah, I guess itâs prosthetics from this point outââand making a point to thank the food service workers. Itâs quite a transformation from a one-time Hollywood âbad boy.â
Without a doubt, the highlight of the telecast was Demi Mooreâs win for The Substance. There is no overlap between Golden Globe and Oscar voters, so these wins can be viewed by some as meaningless. I see them as an audition: If you give a good speech, voters for other organizations will want to see more of you. I canât imagine anyone not wanting to see, well, more of Moore after her profound, personal speech about how The Substance has revived her career and changed how she thinks about success. (Sheâs also outrageously good in the film.)
The night had other great wins: Sebastian Stan for A Different Man is an inspired choice, as is the most surprising win of the night, Fernanda Torres for the Brazilian film Iâm Still Here, over the likes of Nicole Kidman (Babygirl) and Angelina Jolie (Maria). Itâs exciting when that happens!
There were curious things that happened, too, as youâd want from an award show. I screamed with glee just about every time they cut to nominee Jeremy Strong looking like Paddington Bear had dressed up as Jamiroquai for Halloween.
And Jon M. Chuâs speech for Wicked was delivered with a seriousness that was as if he had just received a Nobel Prize for changing the world through his musical movieâwhich tickled me, given that the trophy he was accepting was, basically, âHere Is the Movie That Made the Most Money.â
The Globes are the first in what is about to be a dizzying slog of award shows. Now that itâs rebranded itself as âgoodâ and not âinconsequentially silly and corrupt,â its position in that trudge to the Oscars is unclear.
Every other ceremony reliably rubber-stamps the same winners, to the extent that the Oscar trophies might as well be engraved before the telecast even happens; we are but at the beginning of a long few months of watching celebrity presenters attempt to pronounce âEmilia PĂ©rezâ with a Spanish accent.
The Globes made their mark in the past with their nonsense choices. When, now a legit organization with taste, it is also rewarding the same contenders, does that make it pointless and unnecessary?
The zing of fun that Glaser and the producers managed to bring back to the telecastââvibesâ is truly the only way to describe itâdoes make a case in the Globesâ favor.
I noticed that a little bit of the usual gravity was lost without the lifetime achievement honors handed out during the ceremony. Those speeches have generated some of the most meaningful and buzziest moments in recent Globes history, but this yearâs winners Viola Davis and Ted Danson were feted at a separate event. Thereâs no doubt that their speeches would have been TV gold, but maybe not every award show needs the same heftâespecially if the telecast is going to be as breezy as Sundayâs Globes was.
Look at what weâre dealing with in the world. If weâre going to be celebrating celebrities on top of all thatâŠyeah, breezy is good.