Most of the time we hear about intimacy coordinators, itâs in the context of filmmakers and actors talking about why they donât need them. That rejection, however, is based on the traditional understanding of the role, and our conception of intimacy coordinatorsâwhat they do, and why theyâve become such a hot-button issueâis turned on its head by the new film The Visitor, where the sex is entirely real and unsimulated.
The relatively new role of intimacy coordinatorâIC for shortâsprung up on film and TV sets in the wake of the #MeToo movement, a way to make sure that actors feel comfortable and protected filming sexual or otherwise compromising scenes. But like so many attempts at correcting power imbalance and improving workplace safety, intimacy coordinators typically make headlines when top-level talent are resistant to the concept, which happened most recently with newly minted Best Picture winner Anora. Both writer-director Sean Baker and star Mikey Madison explained why, while the chance to work with an IC was offered, they declined.
Anora is simply one notable example of passing on an IC. But the film makes for a pointed contrast with The Visitor, Bruce LaBruceâs extremely explicit take on Pier Paolo Pasoliniâs Teorema, now in theaters in New York and Los Angeles. On the posters for The Visitor, one of which showcases feet with what appear to be vulva on the soles, thereâs a credit for intimacy coordinator Lidia Ravviso, right next to director of photography Jack Hamilton. Itâs the first time I can remember seeing an IC credited, let alone so prominently.
âSurprisingly, Bruce really wanted to give so much attention to the role,â Ravviso told me. âThere was so much to do on set that for him it was really relevant.â

What makes Ravvisoâs credit even more surprising is that The Visitor is, as mentioned above, not a film with simulated sex. Faked intimate scenes are what we most associate with an intimacy coordinator: careful choreography and ample preparation to make sure it only looks like the actors onscreen are engaged in genital-to-genital (or genital-to-anything-else) contact. In The Visitor, like so many of Bruce LaBruceâs films, the sex is unsimulated, meaning that any of the genital contact we see actually happened.
And itâs also, again in line with LaBruceâs career up to this point, fairly extreme sex. As in Teorema, The Visitor focuses on the title character seducing every member of a bourgeois household. Here, the Visitor is a refugeeâa perhaps literal alien played by Bishop Blackâwho engages the family in increasingly depraved sexual activity. As an underground queer filmmaker, LaBruce is no stranger to pushing boundaries. His latest film features a laundry list of taboos: foot fetishism, body suspension, coprophagy, and all manner of incest. While the latter two are, mercifully, fiction, the lengthy sex scenes are undeniably real.
This all may sound like quite an undertaking for an intimacy coordinator, but it wasnât entirely new terrain for Ravviso. A film director and editor, she trained as an IC with Anica Academy ETS, Italyâs first professional intimacy coordinator training program, and Safe Sets. In addition to her work on sets, sheâs led workshops on consensual practices and kink. But Ravviso also has a background uniquely suited to her role on The Visitor, as a filmmaker who has worked with feminist porn pioneer Erika Lust. It was during the making of Ravvisoâs own feature The Listener, produced by Lust, that she learned about ICs.
âSome of the aspects of the intimacy coordination on set, I was already exploring navigating ethical pornography,â she said. âSo, a certain way to be on set, to navigate boundaries with the actors. It was already a conversation in [the porn] industry.â

The Visitor, however, was Ravvisoâs first feature film as an IC, and her first time working as an IC (instead of as a director) on a film with actual sex. As she acknowledged, her training was tailored to simulated sex scenesâthatâs true of the training intimacy coordinators go through in general, since the vast majority of movies outside of porn donât include the real thing.
âWe not only assist with the consent process, but particularly with the choreography,â she explained of the IC role. âWe are trained to put in place specific techniques for choreography, [including] modesty garments.â For those not in the know, modesty garments are designed to keep actorsâ most intimate anatomy covered and protected from direct contact.
So what does an intimacy coordinator do on a film with unsimulated sex? There were no modesty garments on the set of The Visitor, for exampleâthose (deliberately) get in the way of real sexual contact. But there were still plenty of considerations to be made. Ravviso mentioned being in constant communication with the makeup and costume departments. âYou make sure there are not unnecessary moments when the actor is just waiting naked,â she said. âYou make sure there is a towel or anything else to cover the actor.â
It was cold on setâas it tends to be in London in Aprilâand it didnât help that the title character spends the sex scenes covered in a slimy liquid to emphasize his alien nature. This goo was a ânot pleasantâ addition to skin-to-skin contact. âI had a whole kit bag,â Ravviso shared, âfrom wet wipes to having a hot tea on hand, having the towels, having the slippers.â
Of course, on any independent production, youâre required to be âmulti-skilled,â Ravviso noted. For her, that meant a number of additional tasks, including cleaning the sex toys and making sure that the timing of the body suspensionâthat is, the time an actor spent being held up with hooks in his skinâwas respected. She also recalled an incident when a nude scene filmed on an outdoor street led to police intervention, and Ravviso needed to provide some essential context. âThat wasnât really my role, but I had to deal with the police,â she said.
One of Ravvisoâs most important jobs on the film was one that should hold true for intimacy coordination on any setâwhether the sex is simulated or the real thing. That was creating a safe and comfortable space for the actors, who, in the case of The Visitor, were in unusually vulnerable positions.
âYes, itâs explicit, theyâre naked, but particularly with The Visitor, there was a very strong emotional charge in the scenes,â Ravviso said. âAnd there were some of the actors [where it was the] first time they were having sex on screen. So I was making sure the emotional and psychological well-being of the actor was constantly checkedâbefore, during the scene, and afterwards.â
Given the nature of the film and the scope of Ravvisoâs responsibilities, the benefit of employing an IC seems fairly straightforward. But for those familiar with LaBruceâs work, which is designed to be transgressive and button-pushing, itâs perhaps surprising to learn that he would so readily embrace the role. As it turns out, The Visitor was his second time working with an intimacy coordinator. The first was on 2022âs The Affairs of Lidia, an Erika Lust-produced porn film, and his experience was challenging.
In a 2023 conversation with Interview, LaBruce shared that his first IC, who had only worked on mainstream movies, was not useful to him. âI kept on having to explain to her how sex is represented, how itâs portrayed differently in explicit movies, what the kind of ethical boundaries are, which are different,â he said. âI always argue, you need a stronger kind of ethical or moral compass in porn than in mainstream movies, because it is such a land mine of people being really intimate with each other and itâs very rife for exploitation.â
When Ravviso joined The Visitor, she knew of LaBruceâs feelings about his prior work with an IC. She admitted that she was scared on her first day, but said that she and the director ended up forming an easy bond. According to her, it helped that her background in intimacy coordination came from a genuine interest in cinema and in pornography. And she was âfluidâ working with a filmmaker âwith a very strong artistic visionââthough she was also quick to praise his kindness and respect on set.
LaBruce has shown his appreciation for what Ravviso brought to the project beyond making sure she was credited on the filmâs poster. He has spoken highly of her since their collaboration, including in the Interview piece. âShe was so amazing,â he told the magazine of Ravviso. âShe wasnât policing anything, she wasnât interested in that. She was more like part-sexual therapist, just providing an atmosphere on set that is conducive to sexuality, where everyone is comfortable.â

I asked Ravviso if the âpart-sexual therapistâ designation resonated with her, and she noted that she doesnât have a degree in psychology or any of the requisite training to be seeing and working with patients. In a slightly less literal sense, however, the way she talks about what she does sheds light on LaBruceâs assessment.
For her work on The Visitor, she mentioned using skills outside of what she learned in her IC training program. âI have developed some knowledge in terms of dealing with anxiety or stressful experiences,â she said. âI have my little tool kit, from exercises to whatever, that I use to not be a sex therapist, but someone who tries to create a comfortable work environment for the people involved.â
Even with the background and training Ravviso brought to The Visitor, the film was clearly a learning experience that encouraged adaptability. Intimacy coordinators usually see a script before filming begins so they can flag and begin preparing for any scenes that might require extra care. That ârisk assessmentâ work done ahead of time couldnât happen in this case, with a script that wasnât quite detailed to allow for all the ins and outs of sexâboth figuratively and literally.
At the same time, Ravviso stressed, the sex wasnât spontaneous, no matter how free-flowing it might look on screen. There was always a beat-by-beat discussion beforehand designed to make sure everyone identified their personal boundaries and was fully comfortable with what was about to happen. If there were requests for changes mid-scene, Ravviso had the authority to stop and reconnect with the actors.

âI never felt that we were just throwing the actor in the scene without having discussed with them and having enthusiastic consent from all of them,â she explained.
Hearing an IC talk about their work emphasizes the degree to which it is work. As much joy as there is to creative expression and to sex, thereâs also an essential tedium. But as Ravviso pointed out, this is work that it also being done on porn sets, where there may be a different but similar protocol to establish guidelines that protect performers. While the debate over the need for intimacy coordinators on sets is likely to continueâeven as a younger generation pushes back on sex in film and television more broadlyâmore education on the role could shift the conversation. For its part, The Visitor serves as a relentlessly raunchy reminder that an IC need not sanitize or restrict.
âThe misconception is that you are there to police the directorâs vision, that you might convince the actors thereâs a problem where actually thereâs no problem,â Ravviso said. âWe have heard actors saying, âNo, I donât need an intimacy coordinator.â Maybe theyâre not aware of the dynamic of power that changes from set to set, from relationship to relationship. So why not have it? Thatâs the question.â