When it comes to transgender people arming themselves in light of the threat of harassment or attacks from hate groups, firearm advocate Tucker Carlson is skeptical, he made clear Thursday, insisting that doing so is ânot the exercise of the Second Amendmentâ but rather âpolitical hysteria.â
Carlson called attention to a recent NPR interview with gay and transgender people in New England who practice shooting as a self-defense measure. He then mocked the notion of white supremacist groups in that region, because, as he put it, âevery state is blue.â
âJust to be clear: We are not against peopleâAmerican citizensâcarrying firearms,â Carlson continued. âWe support itâincluding trans people. Itâs fine. But what youâre watching here is not the exercise of the Second Amendment. What youâre watching here is political hysteria: fear ginned up on purpose with maximum dishonesty in order to get people in a state of agitationâarmed people in a state of agitation. It doesnât matter if they are trans or not, whatever that is.â
âItâs the same template always: scare the crap out of your voters, tell them that their lives are at risk, [and] encourage them to get guns,â said the Fox host, who once fretted that gun buybacks are âan incitement to violenceâ and would bring about âcivil war.â âHow do you think that ends?â
In the next breath, Carlson planted in his audienceâs minds a scenario in which transgender people are armed not only with guns, but with F-35 fighter planes and tanks.
âYou have to kind of wonder, like, whatâs the limit to this?â he asked.
âSo if trans people are in fear for their lives, and [if] every region of the country including New EnglandâŠis crawling with Nazis now, why wouldnât we be arming them as we are, say, Ukraineâs trans army? And there are famously trans people in Ukraine; they are very, very proud of that. So why stop with AR-15s? I mean, why not F-35s or tanks?â Carlson wondered. (The NPR story about those in the group called Rainbow Reload made no mention of any government body providing them with guns.)
Nevertheless, Carlson concluded: âWeâre as for guns as you could possibly be, but this seems like an incitement.â