A clinical psychiatrist at a leading medical school says if a patient presented with the rambling incoherence that former president Donald Trump showed in his widely panned debate performance earlier this week he would refer them for a ārigorous neuropsychiatric evaluation.ā
Richard Friedman, a professor of clinical psychiatry and director of Weill Cornell Medical Collegeās psychopharmacology clinic, wrote in The Atlantic Thursday that he watched Trump debate Vice President Kamala Harris āwith particular attention to candidatesā vocabulary, verbal and logical coherence, and ability to adapt to new topicsāall signs of a healthy brain.ā
The Republican nomineeās brain did not win a vote of confidence from the professor.
āDonald Trumpās expressions of those tendencies were alarming,ā he wrote. āHe displayed some striking, if familiar, patterns that are commonly seen among people in cognitive decline.ā
As a key example, Friedman cited Trumpās answerāif it can be called thatāto a question from moderator David Muir about if he has regrets over his behavior during the January 6 riots in 2021.
āI have said āblood bashābath.ā It was a different term, and it was a term that related to energy, because they have destroyed our energy business,ā said Trump, making virtually no sense. āThat was where bloodbath was. Also, on Charlottesville, that story has been, as you would say, debunked. Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity, Jesseāall of these people, they covered it. If they go an extra sentence, they will see it was perfect. It was debunked in almost every newspaper.ā
Friedman noted that, while itās normal for politicians to evade questions, Trumpās response went ābeyond evasionā and essentially amounted to completely irrelevant babbling, an IRL Old Man Yells at Cloud meme.
He also flagged Trumpās ācompulsiveā repetitions, such as bringing up gas pipelines multiple times, including when they were not relevant and, in one case, leading moderators to cut him off to go to commercial.
āIf a patient presented to me with the verbal incoherence, tangential thinking, and repetitive speech that Trump now regularly demonstrates, I would almost certainly refer them for a rigorous neuropsychiatric evaluation to rule out a cognitive illness,ā wrote Friedman. āA condition such as vascular dementia or Alzheimerās disease would not be out of the ordinary for a 78-year-old. Only careful medical examination can establish whether someone indeed has a diagnosable illnessāsimply observing Trump, or anyone else, from afar is not enough.ā
Friedman isnāt alone in his concerns. MSNBC host Chris Hayes said last week there has not been ānearly as much discussion about Trumpās diminished mental acuityā compared to President Bidenās. Trump biographer Timothy OāBrien even told The Guardian he thinks Trump is aware that heās mentally slipping. āWhat weāre seeing now is a reflection of someone whoās very troubled and very desperate,ā OāBrien told the newspaper.
In an attempt to recast his incoherence as a strength, Trump even flamboyantly branded his own purported ramblings as āthe weaveā earlier this month.
āIāll talk about, like, nine different things that they all come back brilliantly together,ā he told a rally in Pennsylvania. āAnd itās likeāand friends of mine that are, like, English professors, they say: āItās the most brilliant thing Iāve ever seen.āā At least one psychiatry professor disagrees.