Republican Senators Rip Hegseth Over Shock Purge
The lawmakers are starting to wonder if the defense secretary’s mass firings might be politically motivated.
Evan Vucci/Pool/Reuters
Top Republican lawmakers have come out swinging against Pete Hegseth’s mass firings at the Pentagon.
Hegseth, 46, announced plans late last month to reduce the number of generals and admirals in the military by a staggering 20 percent. Critics have slammed the move as only the defense secretary’s latest effort to purge seasoned officials he thinks are not loyal enough to the Trump administration.
Senate Armed Services Committee chair Roger Wicker, Senate Appropriations Committee chair Susan Collins, and Sen. Joni Ernst, a member of the Armed Services Committee, all told The Hill on Monday they had only heard about Hegseth’s reductions shortly before he announced them last week.

Wickers blasted Hegseth for not giving any warning about the reductions.
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
“I didn’t get a long lead,” Wickers said, adding that he “wouldn’t have made that a priority if I had been asked.” Ernst said that “the problem is that the secretary did not come and explain this to us before acting on it, much like a lot of the firings that we’ve seen with military personnel.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Collins, who has already raised concerns about Hegseth’s firings during Senate hearings, said the reductions are “deeply troubling” and could deprive the military of the “talent, dedication, and patriotism” among female and minority officials.
Collins expressed concerns over the number of women and Black officers Hegseth has fired.
Eric Lee/Reuters
Hegseth has framed his reductions as gender- and race-neutral. Still, he has faced intense backlash after his earlier purges were found to have disproportionately affected women and Black service members.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
The secretary has often railed against supposed DEI hiring practices since assuming office last year, pledging to strip race, sex, and ethnic background from promotion decisions while eliminating diversity programs and gender and racial targets across the military.

Ernst, who said in September 2025 that she would not seek re-election this November, added that Hegseth had not been forthcoming about his earlier firings either.
Craig Hudson for The Washington Post via Getty Images
“Our system for promoting officers has always been an example of one of the greatest meritocracies that we have,” Collins told The Hill.
“I think that we should adhere to a system that has served us well,” she went on. “There may be a need to reduce the overall number of flag officers at the Pentagon, but this approach seems to be targeted on ideology.”
Other GOP lawmakers say it’s not the first time Hegseth has failed to warn them until just before announcing drastic changes at the Pentagon, or has given them too little information about his decisions.
“He’s failed to respect Congress,” Sen. Thom Tillis, who retires next year, said. “He’s never really given us fulsome briefings.”

Tillis called Hegseth the “face” of a “huge problem” at the Pentagon.
Bill Clark/Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
“We control his purse strings, and he’s almost treating us like we’re some line workers down in the manufacturing facility that he doesn’t want to spend time with,” the North Carolina Republican added. “It’s a huge problem, and I think he’s the face of the problem.”
Asked for comment on this story, a Pentagon spokesperson told the Daily Beast, “It is untrue that Secretary Hegseth is basing promotion decisions on race and sex, and we have said so repeatedly.”
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.


ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT