The producer who worked alongside Ronan Farrow at NBC News on his Harvey Weinstein investigation quit in protest earlier this month.
Rich McHugh tendered his resignation on Friday, Aug. 17, a year to the day that the Weinstein story left with Farrow. Since then, Farrow has won a Pulitzer Prize for a series of articles that revealed allegations of sexual harassment and assaultâand questions have lingered about why the network gave up on the story that helped launch the #MeToo movement.
NBC News has long insisted the Weinstein exposĂ© wasnât ready to run on air or online, contrary to Farrowâs claims that it was. Farrowâs story, which ultimately ran in The New Yorker, was part of a series that ultimately won the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, earned him in the prestigious George Polk Award for National Reporting, and garnered near-universal praise from his colleagues.
The Daily Beast has uncovered new details of how the process went awry, including alleged threats from NBC, back-biting inside the network about who was truly responsible, and a previously unreported ultimatum by Weinsteinâs attorneys.
According to multiple sources familiar with the matter, NBCUniversal deputy general counsel Susan Weiner made a series of phone calls to Farrow, threatening to smear him if he continued to report on Weinstein.
A spokesperson for NBC News, speaking on the condition of anonymity, vigorously denied those allegations. âAbsolutely false,â the spokesperson told The Daily Beast. âThereâs no truth to that all. There is no chance, in no version of the world, that Susan Weiner would tell Ronan Farrow what he could or could not report on.
âThe sole point of the Susan Weinerâs conversation with Farrow, roughly a month after he had left NBC, was to make sure he wasnât still telling sources that he was working on the story for NBC since he had moved on to The New Yorker.â
In February 2015, Farrow lost his daytime show on MSNBC and began working with NBC Newsâ investigative unit. In November 2016, Farrow and a producer named Rich McHugh decided they wanted to do a story about Hollywoodâs âcasting couch,â the longtime practice of producers and other powerful men exchanging sex with women for film roles, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter. The story was timed to be released around the Academy Awards, these sources said.
They presented the idea to NBC News President Noah Oppenheim, who suggested the team look into a October 2016 tweet by actress Rose McGowan that she was raped by a Hollywood executive, according to two sources with knowledge of the investigation.
Over the next several months, Farrow collected evidence that suggested Weinstein had a pattern of inappropriate behavior toward women, according to the sources and previous reporting by The Daily Beast, HuffPost, and The New York Times. Weinstein has repeatedly denied all allegations of non-consensual sex. Sources familiar with the matter previously told The Daily Beast that at least eight women accusing Weinstein had agreed to go on camera, including two alleged victims with their names and faces.
In an interview with The New York Times published Thursday night, McHugh accused âthe very highest levels of NBCâ of later stopping the reporting.
âThere was not one single victim or witness to misconduct by Harvey Weinstein who was willing to go on the record. Not one,â the spokesperson told The Daily Beast.
By February, according to the sources, Farrow had secured an on-the-record interview with McGowan in which the actress said she had been sexually harassed by a powerful producer, though she did not name Weinstein. (McGowan subsequently named Weinstein during the NBC investigation, according to a source with knowledge of the story, but reportedly pulled her interview after being legally threatened by Weinstein, who had reached a $100,000 settlement with her in 1997 after she accused him of sexual assault.)
Farrow and McHugh also obtained a bombshell audio recording from a NYPD sting in which Weinstein admitted to groping Filipina-Italian model Ambra Battilana Gutierrez in 2015. (The Battilana audio was subsequently published by The New Yorker.)
âThe tape on its own was color, it added to an already known accusation,â an NBC spokesperson said. While it was âabsolutely significantâ to hear Battilanaâs voice, the spokesperson said, the tape alone would not expose Weinstein as serial sexual predator, as has been alleged.
NBCâs reluctance stoked Farrow and McHughâs concerns about NBCâs commitment to the story, the sources said. Farrow did not respond to a request for comment. Ari Wilkenfeld, McHughâs attorney, told The Daily Beast that his client âhas no comment.â
In spring 2017, according to the sources, Farrow played Oppenheim the audio of Weinstein with Battilana admitting that he was âused toâ groping womenâs breasts. At one point during their meeting, according to two sources, Oppenheim had asked if people still cared about Weinstein.
âThat is absolutely false,â a NBC spokesperson said, âand it is clearly contradicted by the fact that Oppenheim assigned the story on Harvey Weinstein in the first place. Obviously he understood him to be and believed him to be a newsworthy figure.â
Farrow had begun to suspect that Oppenheimâwho moonlighted as a Hollywood screenwriterâwas potentially communicating with Weinstein directly about the story, according to the sources.
During a meeting in summer 2017, Oppenheim mentioned to Farrow that Weinstein had raised objections to Farrowâs reportingâeven though Farrow had not yet asked Weinstein to comment on the allegations, according to individuals briefed on the meeting.
âExternally, I had Weinstein associates calling me repeatedly,â McHugh told the Times. âI knew that Weinstein was calling NBC executives directly. One time it even happened when we were in the room.â
HuffPost reported last year that Oppenheim had relayed concerns from Weinsteinâs lawyers that Farrow could not report the story because the producer had worked with his estranged father, director Woody Allen. âNo, absolutely not, and Noah Oppenheim never had a conversation with Harvey Weinstein about the content of NBC Newsâ investigation,â the network spokesperson said.
By August 2017, Farrow was prepared to fly to California to interview a woman who was going to claim in silhouette on camera that Weinstein had raped her, according to the sources. Farrow wanted to publish this interview and what he had already gathered, but network higher-ups said he needed more and would not allow Farrow to use an NBC News crew for the interview, according to a person familiar with the matter.
âThree days before Ronan and I were going to head to L.A. to interview a woman with a credible rape allegation against Harvey Weinstein,â McHugh told the Times, âI was ordered to stop, not to interview this woman. And to stand down on the story altogether.â
In an interview with the Times, Oppenheim recalled telling Farrow, âYou canât use an NBC camera crew for another outlet. You can do whatever you want to do. And you donât work for us.â
Farrow went ahead with the interview anyway, paying for a camera crew out of his own pocket, according to sources.
âThe reason the reporting stopped here is because Ronan asked to take it elsewhere because NBC Newsâ determination at the time was that you donât have it yet,â the network spokesperson told The Daily Beast.
Dejected, Farrow approached longtime New Yorker media writer Ken Auletta seeking advice about what to do with his reporting and where to take the story. Farrow had interviewed Auletta, who had twice previously attempted to report news about Weinsteinâs alleged behavior, for the NBC story the previous month. Auletta suggested bringing the story to The New Yorker and called Editor in Chief David Remnick, who accepted the idea.
According to multiple sources, Weinstein attorney Charles Harder claimed in legal threats to Farrow and others that NBC News gave them written assurances that Farrow would not use any reporting he obtained about Weinstein during his time at the network. Harder did not respond to The Daily Beastâs request for comment.
âWe immediately were clear with Weinsteinâs legal team that we disputed the characterizations,â the NBC spokesperson told The Daily Beast.
Despite letters from Weinsteinâs attorneys, Farrow and The New Yorker decided to press on and eventually published the piece just days after The New York Times released its own bombshell report about Weinsteinâs history of alleged sexual misconduct and the use of settlements and nondisclosure agreements to silence accusers.
Immediately after Farrow published his bombshell at The New Yorker, top figures at NBC began pointing fingers at each other, two sources said.
While Oppenheim told staffers at a division-wide town hall meeting that he took responsibility for the decision to let the story go, he privately told at least one colleague that NBC News Chairman Andrew Lack and Senior Communications Vice President Mark Kornblau had made him a scapegoat.
âHe said to me, âIt wasnât my decision,ââ said the colleague who spoke to Oppenheim after Farrowâs story was published at The New Yorker. ââMark Kornblau and Andy Lack are trying to throw me under the bus when it was Andyâs decision,ââ the colleague recalled Oppenheim saying.
âThis conversation is made up out of whole cloth, never happened. There is no daylight between Andy and Noah,â the spokesperson said.
While multiple higher-ups at NBC have repeatedly attempted to dismiss criticism of the networkâs failure to publish the Weinstein story, questions about NBCâs decision are likely to cause more headaches in the coming months.
Earlier this year, publisher Little, Brown announced it was publishing a book by Farrow entitled Catch & Kill, in which he is expected to share his recollection of NBCâs decisions around the Weinstein story and report more broadly on the conspiracy of silence that protects powerful men.
â with additional reporting by Lloyd Grove
Correction: A previous version of this article misstated Weinerâs title. We regret the error.