Americaâs presidents typically have adversarial relationships with the press.
Some, like John F. Kennedy, complained about unfair coverage despite relentlessly manipulating and lying to reporters. Some, like George W. Bush, exploited national tragedies to create a fortress around their administrations in the name of âsecurity,â and severely limited unfettered news coverage of the wars they started. Some, like Barack Obama, have gone after journalists using the most severe government forces available, despite enjoying mostly deferential (and quite often, favorable) coverage from the mainstream news media.
But when it comes to naked contempt for the very concept of a free press, no modern president can hold a candle to Donald Trump.
The former presidentâcurrently running for the 2024 GOP nomination after attempting a coup, inciting a riot at the U.S. Capitol, and instilling in the minds of millions a Big Lie that the 2020 election was stolenâthis week filed suit against the veteran journalist Bob Woodward. Trump claims that by publishing audio of interviews he gave to Woodward in the audio version of Woodwardâs book (as opposed to the print version), the writer is in violation of copyright law.
Do you follow that logic? Me neither.
Many legal experts have said the case is complete nonsense and stands almost no chance of success in court, but thatâs beside the point.
âI am continuing my fight against the corrupt, dishonest, and deranged Fake News Media by filing this lawsuit,â Trump posted on his Twitter knockoff site, Truth Social. âThis was an open and blatant attempt to make me look as bad as possible⌠I will always champion TRUTH and battle against the evil forces of disinformation and Fake News!â the former president continued.
Trump may not be worth the $10 billion heâs claimed, but heâs still plenty rich enough to piss away money on frivolous lawsuits. A judge last month found Trump and his lawyers liable for $1 million in sanctions for pursuing a lawsuit that was part of a âpattern of misusing the courts to serve political purposesâ and constituted âabusive litigation tactics.â
âFrivolous lawsuits should not be used as a vehicle for fundraising or fodder for rallies or social media,â U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks declared.
But what does Trump produce, if not fodder for separating fools from their money or generating toxic noise on social media?
Bob Woodward and his publisher, Simon and Schuster, have the cash to defend themselves against Trumpâs litigious racketeering. But as First Amendment lawyer Ted Boutros told CNNâs Oliver Darcy: âThis is yet another frivolous lawsuit by Donald Trump intended to punish and chill freedom of the press that once again displays his complete misunderstanding of journalism.â
Judge Middlebrooks said Trump âis using the courts as a stage set for political theater and grievance.â And itâs hardly the first time.
He wants CNN to pony up almost $500 million for âdefamation.â Heâs sued the social media giants for âcensorship.â And of course, being a thin-skinned bully, he tried to destroy a small independent local TV station in Wisconsin with a bogus suit for airing a political ad that hurt his feelings.
Think Iâm being unfair in my characterization? Ask Trump himself.
Hereâs what he told The Washington Post about losing a lawsuit against a journalist who questioned his lies about his net worth: âI spent a couple of bucks on legal fees, and they spent a whole lot more. I did it to make his life miserable, which Iâm happy about.â
Yes, Trump hates the âfake news mediaââwhen heâs not acting as an anonymous source or planting favorable stories about himself. But his abuse of the court system to cow journalists and news outlets into submission is just a symptom of his oft-demonstrated aversion to free speech.
Trump has long advocated for âopening up libel lawsâ to make it easier to sue people who write unfavorable things about him. Heâs advocated for criminalizing flag burning and suggested a year in prison or stripping a person of citizenship as a fair penance. Heâs called for stripping TV networks of their licenses. And, of course, the guru of the anti-cancel culture movement has called for innumerable peopleâs firings for their expression.
Trump and his MAGA movement might cloak themselves as devotees of the First Amendment, but thatâs a transparent scam. In fact, by championing their own rights to free expression, while deeming other ideas irredeemably âdivisive,â âunpatrioticâ or âdangerousââitâs fair to describe their position as one of hyper-political correctness (snowflakey, even).
Woodward and his corporate publishing house have little to fear from Trump. But as long as Trump possesses disposable income, heâs free to menace anyone in his disfavor for expressing ideas (or facts) that offend him.
Or, as heâd put it, heâll âmake their lives miserable.â