Kyle Roerink

<p>Gingrich keeps insisting that what separates him from Clinton is that he didn’t perjure himself under oath when deposed in his divorces—the problem with that, as <a href="/content/dailybeast/articles/2011/12/30/gingrich-claims-of-veracity-in-divorces-don-t-hold-up.html">reported earlier in The Daily Beast</a>: he was never deposed.</p>

<p>For years, Newt Gingrich has defended the Clinton impeachment hearings by saying that they were about perjury, and that he always told the truth when deposed in his own divorce proceedings. But no evidence exists that he ever testified. Plus, <a href="/content/dailybeast/articles/2012/01/26/gingrich-continues-to-lie-about-telling-the-truth-under-oath.html">the charade continues: Wayne Barrett follows up on Gingrich's deposition lies</a>.<br> </p>